Read the full story as posted on the front page of ARINSA.org

East and Southern Africa Risk Bulletin - Issue 13

by Julian Rademeyer -

The latest edition of the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime's East and Southern Africa Risk Bulletin examines gangs and politics in Kenya, gold heists in South Africa, growing markets for synthetic cannabinoids in Mauritius, Mayotte, and Comoros, among other issues.

The first story, looking at the way gangs are deployed to influence election campaigns in Kenya, investigates how organized crime can play a role in the degradation of democracy and urban governance.

In South Africa, we look at the alarming phenomenon of heists carried out at gold-smelting facilities, in which armed gangs – well equipped and seemingly with some level of military training – strategically target gold and gold-bearing material. The seemingly connected trends between gold heists, cash-in-transit heists and bank robberies may be indicative of these criminal groups adapting and shifting their key target, illustrating the adaptability of organised crime groups to respond to new developments and situations.

Our investigation of the rapidly growing market in synthetic cannabinoids (types of new psychoactive substances) in Mauritius, Mayotte and Comoros likewise illustrates the adaptability of organised crime groups and illicit markets. This nascent drug market had significant public-health impacts, and presents very different challenges to law enforcement than longer-standing markets in the islands such as the heroin trade.

We then turn from drugs markets and urban governance to governance of the seas. The introduction of private maritime security companies in  the Western Indian Ocean, originally as a response to Somali piracy, fundamentally shifted the role of private military operations at sea. We look at how this market has developed, including allegations of poor safety standards and insufficient regulation of some operators. This story illustrates the long-lasting impacts which responses to organised crime can have on security dynamics and other sectors of the economy.

Download:

Schermata-2020-11-17-alle-18.10.17-190x272.png

294 words

The Politics of Crime - Kenya's gang phenomenon

by Julian Rademeyer -

Political protection and patronage in Kenya have allowed gangs to flourish – and undermine the state's responses to the problem. This is one of the defining characteristics of Kenya’s gang world.

The Politics of Crime, a new report for the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime by Simone Haysom and Ken Opala, traces the evolution of this criminal economy from the colonial-era through the transition to democracy, the effects of structural adjustment policies, and the formal and informal privatization of urban services as cities grew rapidly.

Urban growth, political patronage of gangs, and the criminalization of urban municipal services are inextricably linked in many instances. This has created lucrative profit-making opportunities for gangs and other criminal groups in areas characterized by high unemployment, especially among the youth. Certain criminal gangs have become wealthy by providing informal services or taxing residents for transport, waste removal, electricity and water provision. As a result, they have become deeply embedded in the everyday lives of citizens in Nairobi and Mombasa.

The Politics of Crime traces the evolution of this criminal economy from the colonial-era through the transition to democracy, the effects of structural adjustment policies, and the formal and informal privatization of urban services as cities grew rapidly.

For more information, visit gangs.globalinitiative.net.

210 words

Attachment Politics of Crime.jpg

From the UK’s first Deferred Prosecution Agreement to a plea bargain in Tanzania

by Kudzai Chinoda -

From the UK’s first Deferred Prosecution Agreement to a plea bargain in Tanzania


The first Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) of the United Kingdom Serious Fraud Office (SFO), secured on 30 November 2015 at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, has on 26 August 2020 given rise to a plea bargain settlement in Tanzania. As announced by Tanzania’s National Prosecutions Service (NPS), this nets the Tanzanian authorities TZS 1.5 billion (approx. USD 650,000 or GBP 500,000).

Standard Bank PLC (now ICBC Standard Bank PLC) was the subject of an SFO investigation leading to an indictment alleging failure to prevent bribery contrary to section 7 of the UK’s Bribery Act 2010. This represented the first significant use of this section of the Act and led to the first DPA entered into by the SFO.

As a result, the criminal proceedings were immediately suspended, Standard Bank was fined a total of USD 25.2 million, and required to pay the Government of Tanzania a further USD 7 million in compensation. In addition, Standard Bank was bound to cooperate fully with the SFO in its ongoing enquiries and make available material to support the domestic investigation in Tanzania.

From London to Dar es Salaam – making international cooperation work

The investigation in Tanzania, led by the Prevention and Combating of Corruption Bureau (PCCB), related to a USD 6 million payment made in March 2013 by a former sister company of Standard Bank (Stanbic Bank Tanzania) to a local partner (Enterprise Growth Market Advisors – EGMA). The payment was suspected to be intended to induce Tanzanian public officials to show favour to Stanbic Bank Tanzania and Standard Bank’s proposal for a USD 600 million private placement to be carried out on behalf of the Government.

The PCCB investigation in 2016 led to the arrest of former Tanzania Revenue Authority Director General, Harry Msamire Kitilya; Stanbic Bank’s former Head of Investment Banking, Shose Mori Sinare and former Chief Legal Counsel, Sioi Graham Solomon; and two Ministry of Finance officials, Bedason Anthony Shallanda and Alfred Paul Misana.

Between 2016 and August 2020, this case consumed a significant amount of time and effort of the PCCB and the NPS. During the early days, the investigation focused on material held in Tanzania. However, quickly it became clear that the material held abroad was equally essential. A combination of UK and international partners, including the International Centre for Asset Recovery (ICAR) at the Basel Institute on Governance, came together to support the PCCB and NPS. A large number of witnesses were interviewed and significant volumes of material were shared from the UK and South Africa.

This cross-border sharing of material and evidence was challenging due to their sheer volume but also cross-border legal differences. In the SFO, the PCCB and NPS found a willing partner to tackle these challenges. With the help of the UK Criminal Justice Advisor in Tanzania, the mutual legal assistance process with the UK was actioned. The PCCB also partnered with the Basel Institute to secure evidence from South Africa and to collate the significant electronic material from the UK for use during the trial.

The like-mindedness of all partners involved created a perfect environment for swift and pragmatic problem solving, testing new ideas and investigation methods, and building a closer rapport with fellow law enforcement officers and prosecutors. A series of firsts and positive results meant that the case was ready for trial in 2019. However, only part way through the hearings when the global covid-19 pandemic hit, the trial faced many adjournments during the early part of 2020. In the meantime, in September 2019, Tanzanian legislation was amended to permit plea bargain agreements.

The combination of these facts resulted in the negotiation of a plea bargain under which, on 26 August 2020, the defendants pleaded guilty to 1 out of 58 charges of occasioning economic loss to the Government, were ordered to jointly issue a payment of TZS 1.5 billion and were fined a further TZS 1 million each.   

Is this a good result?

If we focus strictly on the principal sum involved – a settlement for approximately one tenth of the sum (TSZ 12 billion) which was fraudulently obtained – it sounds like a small prize. But this needs to be seen in a wider context and in light of other positives to be drawn from the process.

First, we must understand that the loss suffered by the Government had already been compensated by Standard Bank. Second, the defendants had already been held in custody in Tanzania for a period of over four years at the point of the plea. Third, the financial enquiries made did not identify realisable assets of any great value in relation to the defendants who were arrested.

Finally, in the current court timeline, the prosecution would have needed to continue to call evidence well into the next 18 months, with the defence case to follow. Further covid-19 related delays could be expected with respect to securing witness testimony, all together causing significant costs to the Tanzanian judicial system. And we should not forget that irrespective of the confidence in the evidence leading to prosecute, a conviction is never guaranteed until the court passes its final judgement.

Beyond that, from a practitioner’s perspective, another positive take-away has been the opportunity for five separate entities, from Tanzania and abroad, to come together successfully for a common goal. This multi-agency effort and learning process was key to allow the investigation to be completed, secure all necessary evidence, charge and ultimately bring the matter to trial. It is clear that the collective weight of the domestic and international evidence was a factor the defendants considered when entering a plea mid-trial. Whilst not envisaged at the start, a resolution that is agreeable to all parties, taking into account all factors, must be considered in a positive light.

Finally, the result sends an important message amongst the Tanzanian and international community – stating clearly that the PCCB and the NPS are working together, and that Tanzania can count on its international partners to jointly ensure that international borders do not present a barrier to Tanzania’s fight against corruption.


1017 words

Trade Based Money Laundering Webinar

by Kudzai Chinoda -

Trade Based Money Laundering Webinar

Poster on Trade based Money laundering

Introduction

During the COVID pandemic, several governments in the Southern African region introduced lockdown measures. To take advantage of the work from home modalities and travel restrictions that had been put in place, in May 2020 UNODC Southern Africa, started engaging the ARINSA family to take online money laundering courses. As a result UNODC has been running several e-learning courses via the ARINSA website and this will likely continue into the foreseeable future. During each month focus was given to specific topics. The focus for the month of May was “Introduction to Money Laundering”. In the month of July, the focus was on “Financial Investigations: Search and Seizures”. During the month of August, the focus was on “prosecuting money laundering and asset forfeiture cases”. The month of September has been reserved for the judiciary.

In addition to these courses and based on the priorities set by the ARINSA countries, UNODC will run a Trade-Based Money Laundering e-Training from 19- 20 October 2020. 

The e-training is intended to be undertaken by judges and magistrates, staff members of the FIU, customs, police, tax/revenue administrators, and other law enforcement authorities responsible for money laundering investigations.   It comprises of six (6) sessions that are covered in a two and a half day live webinar.

 

The objectives and the agenda of the webinar are outlined  in the table on the following pages. 

UNODC kindly requests all contact points, heads of departments and colleagues to spread this message to all relevant stakeholders within the asset forfeiture space to avail themselves to take this course.

We hope that you will enrol and be able to enjoy, and benefit from this course.

  

ARINSA E-TRAINING
«TRADE-BASED MONEY LAUNDERING»

VENUE & FORMAT

ARINSA Platform – Live Webinars (no recording will be available)

Invitation link will be sent to the registered participants

REGISTRATION

CLOSING DATE


   Monday 12th October

DATE & TIME

Monday 19th October 2020 09:00 – 12:30 AM SAST

Tuesday 20th October 2020 09:00 – 12:30 AM SAST

DURATION

Day 1: 180 min, 3 sessions with two 10-minute breaks
Day 2: 180 min, 3 sessions with two 10-minute breaks

LANGUAGE

The webinar will be held in ENGLISH.
No simultaneous interpretation will be provided.

OBJECTIVES

Participants from competent authorities will raise their awareness about: 

o   TBML as one of the most complicated money laundering typologies;

o   most common TBML techniques;

o   commonalities & difference between TBML and customs crimes;

o   counterparts in TBML investigations within the public and private sectors;

o   value of a financial investigation for the identification of previously unknown facts, persons and entities;

o   TBML techniques for non-ML purposes.

The webinar features interaction with participants through chat, quizzes, feedback forms, and live questions. The webinar provides the main concepts of TBML.

AGENDA

Day 1

09:00 – 10:00

Session 1. Introduction into money laundering

In this session, participants will learn and understand the elements of a money-laundering offence and, among others, the concept of a predicate offence. This understanding is essential for the ability of law enforcement and criminal justice authorities to go beyond primary criminal act charges, and, by applying widest possible prosecution toolset, go after the proceeds of crime.

10:00 – 10:10

Break

10:10 – 11:10

Session 2. Financial investigations

In this session, participants will learn the value of the "follow the money" approach. Financial investigations are instrumental for the purposes of:

       i.            identifying the extent of criminal networks;

       ii.           tracing the proceeds of crime or any other assets that are, or may become, subject to confiscation;

      iii.            and developing evidence which can be used in criminal proceedings.

 

11:10 – 11:20

break

11:20 – 12:30

Session 3. Basic TBML techniques

In this session, participants will familiarise themselves with the most common techniques used to launder money through trade. Participants will also learn what are the differences between TBML and customs crimes.

   Day 2

09:00 – 10:00

Session 4. National cooperation

TBML schemes exploit vulnerabilities of both trade and financial systems. Hence, effective detection of TBML requires the use of both financial and trade data. This data, however, is usually collected, stored and processed by different authorities, which might not always have mechanisms or will to exchange information between themselves. In this session, participants will learn about effective cooperation and exchange of information mechanisms at a national level for TBML investigation purposes.

10:00 – 10:10

 Break

10:10 – 11:10

Session 5. International cooperation

Since TBML schemes seek to explore and abuse vulnerabilities of the international trade system, the absence of effective international cooperation, particularly related to the exchange of information between FIUs and Customs. In this session, participants will learn about the primary tools for international cooperation available to various competent authorities, and how to effectively use them for TBML investigations.

11:10 – 11:20

break

11:20 – 12:30

Session 6. TBML techniques for non-ML purposes

Techniques used for laundering money through trade may be used for other purposes than TBML. In this session, participants will learn for what other purposes perpetrators may resort to the techniques indicative of TBML, and how to differentiate those from TBML.

TARGET AUDIENCE

The webinar is particularly recommended for the following competent authorities:

o   FIU (analysis)

o   Customs (risk analysis and post-audit)

o   Police (criminal and financial investigations)

o   Public prosecutors

o   Tax/Revenue administrations (tax analysis and tax auditors)

o   Other law enforcement authorities responsible for money laundering investigations

o   Judges (optional)

Each registered participant will receive a confirmation email with instructions on how to connect to the webinar and its rules of engagement. Upon successful completion of the webinar and the final quiz, a participant will receive a digital certificate.

REGISTRATION PRACTICALITIES

In order to register for this e-learning course participants need to be a part of the ARINSA website platform. ARINSA website membership application forms can be obtained from Yeukai.Tizora@un.org. Upon completion, forms must be scanned and sent to Yeukai and copying arinsa@un.org, for registration. Kindly note that only typed or clearly hand-written (in CAPITAL LETTERS) forms are accepted. Please send an email to the above addresses in case of any challenges registering to the platform. Please Note that: Yahoo email addresses are blocking emails from our system therefore we encourage you to kindly use alternative email addresses.

Those who are already part of the ARINSA platform but have forgotten login credentials should send an email request clearly stated “forgotten password” to Yeukai.Tizora@un.org and copy arinsa@un.org.

Upon receipt of the ARINSA website login credentials, Click this link to register: https://arinsa.org/mod/feedback/view.php?id=422

OR follow to path below:


Learning - E-LEARNING REGISTRATION & ACCESS -Trade Based Money Laundering Webinar Registration

The link for the webinar will be emailed to all registered users towards to date of the webinar.

 

PRESENTERS

Yevheniy UMANETS – 

Image

 
AML Adviser at the Global Programme against Money Laundering, Proceeds of Crime and the Financing of Terrorism (GPML)

over 12 years of professional experience in the area of anti-money laundering both nationally (Analytical Department, FIU Ukraine, and AML Policy Coordinator, Secretariat of the Government of Ukraine) and internationally (Western Union, and UNODC)

over 7 years of practical experience in implementing national and regional capacity-building programmes across Central Asia, Caucasus, West Africa, Eastern Europe, Western Balkans, Central America and the Caribbean;

4 years at diplomatic service.

      Pedro GOMES PEREIRA

Text Box:former Brazilian prosecutor with over 15 years of experience in anti-money-laundering, asset recovery and anti-corruption areas at the national and international levels;

engagement with various international organisation such as UN, World Bank, StAR initiative, Council of Europe, OECD, OSCE;

assisted numerous jurisdictions in different regions of the globe in devising their investigative and prosecutorial strategies in relation to real cases, with a view to raising the efficiency of the investigations and prosecutions;

a seasoned trainer for law enforcement and prosecutorial authorities in matters ranging from the asset recovery process, investigating and prosecuting corruption and money laundering, mutual legal assistance and managing seized assets. 



1330 words

Financial intelligence flagged Fishrot deals worth N$10 billion

by Kudzai Chinoda -

Financial intelligence flagged Fishrot deals worth N$10 billion

News - National | 2020-09-09

by Shinovene Immanuel


THE director of the Financial Intelligence Centre, Leonie Dunn, on Wednesday said they flagged an amount of at least N$17 billion suspected to be the proceeds of crime.

Of this amount, deals worth N$10 billion are linked to the Fishrot scandal.

Dunn announced this during the FIC's annual report presentation.

“A total value of potential proceeds of crime amounting to N$17 billion is now subject to investigations by law-enforcement authorities and other identified competent authorities,” she said.

Dunn said the FIC contributed to 84 investigations conducted by the Namibian Police and the Anti-Corruption Commission.

“The top five underlying predicate offences investigated include fraud, corruption, poaching, dealing in drugs, illegal deposit taking/pyramid schemes and money laundering,” she said.

The FIC said investigations by these law-enforcement agencies with assistance of the Office of the Prosecutor General secured 15 money-laundering convictions, and criminal sanctions applied.

“Furthermore, there are 50 other cases with elements of money-laundering offences currently pending before various courts,” she said.

Several of the Namibians involved in the scandal have been arrested, including former fisheries minister Bernhard Esau, his son-in-law Tamson “Fitty” Hatuikulipi, former Justice Minister Sacky Shanghala, and Mike Nghipunya, the suspended head of Fishcor.

Two top managers of a Namibian branch of the South African investment fund Investec (now Ninety One) have also been arrested for their alleged involvement in their scheme: James Hatuikulipi, the firm's managing director for asset management (and Tamson Hatuikulipi's cousin), and the firm's former head of client management, Ricardo Gustavo.

 



263 words

Fishrot accused back in court

by Kudzai Chinoda -

Fishrot accused back in court

News - National | 2020-08-31

by Werner Menges

FORMER ministers Bernhard Esau and Sacky Shanghala and the four men charged with them in the Fishrot corruption case are due to return to the Windhoek Magistrate's Court at the end of this week, following the latest postponement of their case on Friday.

The case was postponed for a week after lawyers representing the six accused objected to magistrate Alweendo Venatius deciding a request by the state for a longer postponement. Venatius last year issued search warrants used by the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in its investigation of the matter.

Also on Friday, one of the co-accused of Esau and Shanghala, James Hatuikulipi, a police reservist, Kuutondokwa Kokule, and a Windhoek resident, Jason Iyambo, were informed that the prosecutor general has decided to arraign them in the Windhoek Magistrate's Court on charges of corruptly giving gratification, alternatively bribery, and defeating or obstructing the course of justice.

The charges are based on allegations that they tried to bribe an ACC officer in January in an attempt to get him to hand evidence seized by the ACC – bank cards issued to Hatuikulipi and a handwritten document – to them.

Hatuikulipi, Kokule and Iyambo are due to appear in the court again on Wednesday to have dates set for their trial.

Esau, Shanghala, Hatuikulipi, Esau's son-in-law Tamson Hatuikulipi, Ricardo Gustavo and Pius Mwatelulo are charged with corruption, fraud and money laundering in connection with the use of Namibian fishing quotas allocated under a fisheries cooperation agreement between Namibia and Angola.

They are alleged to have received corrupt payments of more than N$103 million from two Icelandic-owned companies allowed to exploit fishing quotas allocated under the fisheries cooperation agreement with Angola.

Esau, Shanghala, James and Tamson Hatuikulipi, Mwatelulo and the former chief executive of the National Fishing Corporation of Namibia (Fishcor), Mike Nghipunya, are also scheduled to appear in court on Friday in the case in which they are charged over alleged corruption with the use of fishing quotas allocated to Fishcor and  made available to Icelandic-owned companies under quota usage agreements.

In that case, the six accused are charged with having diverted N$75,6 million from Fishcor to themselves or entities of their choice between August 2014 and December 2019.

https://www.namibian.com.na/94185/read/Fishrot-accused-back-in-court


384 words

Mozambique: London hidden debts trial may call Presidente Filipe Nyusi

by Kudzai Chinoda -

Mozambique: London hidden debts trial may call Presidente Filipe Nyusi


By  LUSA

Credit Suisse is threatening to call the president of Mozambique, Filipe Nyusi, in the trial opposing the investment bank to the African state in the High Court of London in the case of ‘hidden debts’, due to be heard next year.

In a document submitted to the court, Credit Suisse admits adding Nyusi to the case as a defendant “to account for his irregularities.

The bank’s lawyers have asked the Mozambican authorities, in a letter dated 11 May, to confirm that the head of state is not claiming immunity in this case, but by July had not received a reply.  

The Attorney General’s Office of Mozambique initiated this case in the British courts to try to cancel the debt of $622 million (552.6 million euros) of the state-owned company Proindicus to Credit Suisse and to demand compensation to cover all losses resulting from the ‘hidden debt’ scandal.

At stake are the ‘hidden debts’ of the Mozambican state of around $2 billion (€1.8 billion) contracted between 2013 and 2014 in the form of credit from the British subsidiaries of the investment banks Credit Suisse and VTB on behalf of the Mozambican state companies Proindicus, Ematum and MAM.

The deal accentuated a public financial crisis and led Mozambique to default on payments to international creditors.

If Credit Suisse is found guilty, President Nyusi may be liable to pay a “compensation or contribution”, the bank said in the updated defence argument deposited in court at the beginning of July. 

The basis for the potential liability is a reference to a million-dollar payment made in 2014 by Privinvest to a company established in the United Arab Emirates with the references ‘Nys’, ‘New man’, ‘Nuy’ or ‘New guy’, which the bank’s lawyers suggest would be Nyusi, minister of defence at the time, because of the resemblance to the name.

Another indication is the testimony of Lebanese businessman Jean Boustani during a trial in the United States of America linked to the ‘hidden debts’ case, alleging that he had set aside $6 million to finance Nyusi’s election campaign.

Boustani, accused by the U.S. Attorney’s Office of conspiracies to commit transfer fraud, securities fraud and money laundering, was found not guilty.

Credit Suisse also attributes a “substantive role of President Nyusi in the consideration and approval of Proindicus and Ematum transactions” and that, assuming payments were made to other members and officials of the government, “payments to him would be necessary for the transactions to occur.

The bank’s attorneys claim that if it is actually proven that the deal was illicit, as the complaint alleges, “President Nyusi participated in it through (at least) alleged acceptance of bribery and violation of the duties of Mozambican law,” and may be “responsible as a co-conspirator.

Last week it was learned that the former President Armando Guebuza has been called in the case as a relevant person to help clarify the case.

On the ‘Third Parties’ list are Armando Ndambi Guebuza, his eldest son, Gregório Leão, the former director of the State Information and Security Services (SISE), António Carlos do Rosário, Mozambique’s former finance minister Manuel Chang and Isaltina Lucas, the former national director of the Mozambican Treasury.

The court also intends to hear Teófilo Nhangumele and Bruno Langa, two people close to Armando Ndambi Guebuza.

With the exception of Armando Guebuza and Isaltina Lucas, all the personalities that the High Court of Justice in London intends to hear are being held in Mozambique accused of involvement in the ‘hidden debt’ scandal.

Iskandar Safa, owner of Privinvest, has also been referred to in the case as an assistant.

The trial in the Commercial Court of the London High Court is scheduled to begin in 2021.

https://www.macaubusiness.com/mozambique-london-hidden-debts-trial-may-call-presidente-filipe-nyusi/

630 words

The scandal that kept ex-TRA boss Kitilya behind bars for 4 years

by Kudzai Chinoda -

The scandal that kept ex-TRA boss Kitilya behind bars for 4 years

 

In Summary

The scandal that kept ex-TRA boss behind bars for 4 years

By Bernard James @TheCitizenTz bjames@tz.nationmedia.com

Dar es Salaam. Former Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) commissioner general Harry Kitilya, 70, and four other people breathed fresh air yesterday after languishing in remand prison for four years in one of Tanzania’s high profile and dramatic Sh12 billion ($6 million) bribery scandal.

The Corruption and Economic Crimes Division of the High Court declared Kitilya, the 1996 Miss Tanzania and former head of Investment Banking with Stanbic bank, Shose Senare, and former chief legal officer to the bank Sioi Sumari free after they entered a plea bargain agreement with the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to pay a whopping Sh1.5 billion for their freedom.

Others who walked free were two senior officials of the ministry of Finance-- Bedason Shallanda and Alfred Misana, who also entered a plea bargaining arrangement with the DPP.

The court ordered them to jointly pay Sh1.5 billion on plea bargaining agreement and additional Sh1 million each to secure their freedom for causing the government a $6 million in losses.

Plea bargaining was introduced in the country last year and has mostly been the avenue for suspects in mega corruption cases to escape full trial.

The four pleaded guilty of causing the $6 million loss to the government before Lady Justice Immaculate Banzi.



They were facing charges of forgery, uttering false information and fraudulently obtaining $6 million (about Sh12 billion) which was paid to them as a kickback in facilitating the securing of the $600 million foreign loan by the government of Tanzania.

Mr Kitilya’s firm, Enterprise Growth Markets Advisors (EGMA), was allegedly paid the over Sh12 billion bribe in the loan transaction.

How it started

The lucrative loan facilitation deal that would lead high profile bribery scam started with an idea in the US between Mr Kitilya and Ms Sinare during a meeting of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Washington in April, 2012, and had conversation on government financing.

The two later took their dream to a top level, playing key roles in securing a $600 million foreign loan for the government and opening a can of worms over mega corruption in the country.

After the Washington meeting in which both attended as part of a government delegation, Ms Sinare allegedly boasted to fellow staff that Mr Kitilya introduced her to two African central bank governors who convinced her bank to consider the business of raising funds for the government.

Details of what followed came to the limelight following investigations by UK’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO) that exposed how the 2013 government loan was used to create the Sh12 billion bribery conduit that benefited public and private corporate executives.

Details from SFO show how Ms Sinare and Mr Kitilya’s EGMA, the firm that was paid the Sh12 billion in bribe in the loan transaction, facilitated behind-the-scene talks to secure the deal.

Who played what role

SFO which carried out the corruption investigation involving Stanbic and its main unity, Standard Bank’s role, revealed a link between individuals who were central to the deal and how they may have influenced it.

Other than the former TRA chief who played a camouflage role as EGMA coprincipal, the negotiations were handled at either stage by former finance minister Mustafa Mkulo, his successor William Mgimwa, former Finance permanent secretary Ramadhan Khijja, former finance permanent secretary Dr Servacius Likwelile, and other senior treasury officials.

The two officials of the Ministry of Finance, Bedason Shallanda, who was the commissioner for Policy Analysis-Debts and Alfred Misana, the assistant commissioner for Policy Analysis-Debts were joined in the case in January, 2019.

The two officials were jointly facing one count of use of documents intended to mislead the principal with the additional charge of leading organized crime, one count of money laundering, obtaining money by false pretences and occasioning loss to the government.

Court documents show that the two officials acted on documents containing false statement to show that Stanbic Bank (Tanzania) Limited in collaboration with Standard Bank London, would raise the loan of $550 million for the government of Tanzania at an agreement fee of 2.4 percent of the principal amount.

They were also accused of using the Standard Bank’s Financing Proposal with the intention of misleading the government.

Sioi together with Mr Kitilya and Ms Sinare, allegedly prepared a false agreement dated November 5, 2012 purporting to show that the bank has established a consortium to collaborate with EGMA Limited to arrange for the financing of the money.

The former taxman and the ex-officials of Stanbic Bank, Ms Sinare and Sioi were arraigned on April 1, 2016 and they have since been languishing in jail for facing the unbailable money laundering charge.

In a dramatic turn of events, the DPP dropped all charges against Kitilya and two co-accused in January last year and filed a new case with 58 new charges against them.

They have appeared at the Kisutu Resident Magistrate’s Court over 72 times when the case against them was called for mention, hearing of applications and rulings.

Yesterday, Lady Justice Banzi said she considered submissions of both parties and the plea bargain agreement and its execution mode and ordered each of the accused to pay Sh1 million in court and another Sh1.5 billion to be paid jointly.

The plea bargaining agreement between the accused and the DPP was filed in court on Monday for registration.

The agreement, among other things, exonerated the accused of 57 out of 58 counts they face but sustained one charge of causing Sh$6 million loss to the government, of which the accused pleaded guilty and ordered to pay Sh1.5 billion.

The accused took an oath before the judge questioned them on the voluntariness of the agreement and if they have read them through and understood its stated terms.

The agreement also means the accused denied themselves the right to have their case heard to the end and decided on merits and the right to appeal on the same.

Under the agreement, the accused may face fresh charges in return for a guilty plea if it is discovered that they have given false information. All the accused agreed to the terms of the contract.

Details of the plea bargain were not made known to the public as the matter is completely a private process.

Yesterday, DPP Biswalo Mganga represented the Republic in person and asked the court to order the accused to pay a Sh1.5 billion compensation for the loss they have caused to the government as agreed in the plea bargain.

“All the accused, have pleaded guilty to the charges. This court has convicted them all for pleading guilty of causing a $6 million loss to the government,” said Lady Justice Banzi.

Lead defence counsel Alex Mgongolwa pleaded with the court to give a lenient punishment considering the accused have confessed to the offences to save court time and government resources.

He added that Mr Kitilya, with 70 years of age, had underlying health conditions and that the accused who have spent over four years behind bars have families depending on them.

    


1200 words

Why Haji wants Obado and his three children jailed

by Kudzai Chinoda -

Why Haji wants Obado and his three children jailed

Governor to be charged alongside his three children and directors of 11 companies of his proxies.

  • Money was sent to Obado's children abroad for fees and upkeep.
  • Obado's proxy Jared Kwaga roped in his family in the grand scheme.

It is end of the road for Migori Governor Okoth Obado and his proxies whom he is alleged to have used to siphon millions of county funds to local and offshore accounts.

Director of Public Prosecutions Noordin Haji on Tuesday approved the arrest and prosecution of Obado and his three children, dealing a staggering blow to the family as the governor is separately battling murder charges.

Obado will now be barred from accessing office, a precedent that has already been set in other graft cases. 

Also to be charged is Jared Kwaga — said to be Obado’s closest proxy in the siphoning of county cash. Kwaga, also roped in his own family — including his wife and mother. 

Also to be charged are directors of 11 companies that Obado and his associates registered soon after he became governor through which they pocketed millions of shillings in “fictitious” contracts.

“The investigations were in respect of Sh73.4 million being sums indirectly received by the governor Migori county through his children who received multiple payments from companies trading with the Migori county government between 2013-2017,” Haji said in a statement to newsrooms.

According to an audit trail by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission, the companies that were trading with the Migori county government wired Sh38.9 million to the accounts of Obado’s three children.

The money was used as their school fees, upkeep, maintenance and medical bills in Australia, Scotland and United Kingdom. 

The three children who will be charged alongside their father are Achola Dan Okoth, Susan Scarlet Okoth and Jerry Zachary Okoth.

“Some of the monies were also traced to have bought two motor vehicles of make, Toyota Land Cruiser V8,” Haji said. 

Obado has had a troubled career after his re-election in 2017.

In September 2018, the governor was arrested over the gruesome murder of his pregnant girlfriend Sharon Otieno.

Obado’s wife was also questioned in relation to the gangland killing that shocked the nation.

In the new case, Kwaga’s wife Christine Akinyi Ochola, his mother Peninah Auma Otago and his brothers Joram Opala Otieno as well as Patroba Ochanda will also be charged.

Also to be arraigned is Kwaga’s sister-in law Carolyne Anyango Ochola.

Recently, EACC discovered that Kwaga had purchased a Sh35 million house in Loresho, yet it was Obado’s daughter Everlyne who was collecting the rent.

EACC chief executive officer Twalib Mbarak said the 23 persons and entities will be charged with, among others, conspiracy to commit an offense of corruption, conflict of interest, money laundering and unlawful acquisition of public property.

According to the documents EACC filed in court, Kwaga’s companies were paid Sh1.6 billion since 2013.

"These funds have been used to acquire and construct properties worth over Sh1 billion registered in the governor's and Kwaga's names. We have traced these properties," EACC said in court papers.

In 2018, the High Court issued orders barring Kwaga and his family from selling or transferring about  65 properties — including maisonettes, apartments and land — all valued at over Sh382 million.

The High Court restrained the owners and interested parties or their agents from “transferring, charging, disposing, wasting or any other way alienating the properties.”

The DPP is likely to ask the court that the properties be surrendered to the government.

Also to be charged is Jared Kwaga — said to be Obado’s closest proxy in the siphoning of county cash. Kwaga, also roped in his own family — including his wife and mother. 

Also to be charged are directors of 11 companies that Obado and his associates registered soon after he became governor


637 words